Visible or invisible encounters, what do you prefer?

[darchole]

What time did I post that? I meant M4, not M5!

Well at least he killed the big boss sometime yesterday. Or at least before 7am this morning.

[Bluerose]

I like visible gives me an idea on how many are coming at me

[Indinera]

I like visible gives me an idea on how many are coming at me

even when visible means just one sprite for one battle (ie the sprite could contain 6 different monsters lol)?

[Alikamou]

Love the VISIBLE in your dungeons It gives me a chance to either meet it head on or dodge until I'm ready ::biggrin I do think random encounters on the *world map* is fine

[Indinera]

I have decided the following for my next game:
Visible everywhere (including worldmap).

Hope you guys are going to be happy!

[D-Squall]

I wouldn't mind invisible on the world map, but that's okay.

[Cassiopeia]

Happy, happy!

[Indinera]

I'm glad, I'm glad.

[Alikamou]

Now Indy has me worried Does this mean he's gonna make us go up against like...more monsters????? Probably

[Cassiopeia]

Hehe! No, "everywhere" just means, solely visible, no random encounters in some of the places.

[Alikamou]

Ah...but Indy did mention that an encounter could have *many* instead of up to four opponents to battle, just like the little *blowfish-looking* ones and the *dead thingies/spiders* on MM4 If it weren't for Marine and whomever had that belt to hit twice or more, I'd me in deep trouble

[Indinera]

so here is how it will work:

visible encounters on all the maps including the worldmap
each enemy is visible, like in LF, which means if a party of 6 enemies attack you, you see all 6 coming your way. it's not "one sprite - several enemies".

Hope that clarifies things a bit!

[Cassiopeia]

That sounds great!

[Indinera]

all the best choices were made?

[Cassiopeia]

Most definitely!